The application of Hillier's space syntax theory in measuring the quality of urban space; Case study: Queen Street, Auckland (New Zealand)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Urban Planning. Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A. in Urban Design, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Ph.D. in Urban Planning. Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Urban design, considering social, economic, and environmental needs, organizes urban spaces in a way that both meets the needs of citizens and enhances social interactions and quality of life. This process, focused on sustainability and efficiency, creates environmentally friendly and economically beneficial spaces that strengthen residents' sense of belonging and improve the living environment. Good urban design enhances the quality of urban spaces and, ultimately, the quality of urban life by emphasizing aspects such as accessibility, safety, and social connectivity. In this process, combining analytical methods with various stages of design aids in idea development and continuous assessment, increasing the likelihood of project success. This study examines the application of space syntax on Queen Street in the central trade district of Oakland City to answer the question: "How would the urban space quality of this street be evaluated using space syntax, and what challenges might arise in this evaluation?" Space syntax theory, which analyzes spatial layouts and their impact on human behavior, provides a tool for assessing connectivity, accessibility, and the integrity of pathways within the urban network. This tool is particularly valuable for understanding how spatial configurations influence social behavior. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research incorporated both quantitative and qualitative data; quantitative data was analyzed through DepthMap software, while qualitative data was collected to understand Queen Street’s role in the social and cultural context. The findings show that Queen Street benefits from adequate connectivity within the urban network and, as a key route, supports pedestrian activity and vibrancy in the central trade area. However, improvements such as enhancing pedestrian safety and optimizing traffic flow could further increase the street’s functionality. Analyzing Queen Street with space syntax revealed several challenges, including the complexity of data analysis and the subjective interpretations that may influence results. Additionally, temporal factors and cultural sensitivity are necessary to ensure that design recommendations align with local values. This study concludes that space syntax is a useful tool in evaluating urban space quality; however, ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration and integrating these analyses with qualitative insights can provide a more comprehensive understanding of urban spaces, fostering environments that are more sustainable and aligned with community needs.

Highlights

  • Application of Space Syntax Method at the Urban Space Scale
  • Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using the Space Syntax Method on Queen Street in Auckland, New Zealand

Keywords


  1. Alabi, M. O. (2021). Space syntax: Evaluating the influence of urban form and socio-economy on walking behavior in neighborhoods of Akure, Nigeria. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 9(1), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2021.2003234
  2. Architectus Australia. (2023). Retrieved from https://architectus.com.au/ on December 20, 2023 at 14:30.
  3. Askarizad, R., Lamíquiz Daudén, P. J., & Garau, C. (2024). The application of space syntax to enhance sociability in public urban spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Geo-Information, 13, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13070227
  4. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., Tiesdell, S., & Carmona, M. (2003). Public Places - Urban Spaces. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080515427
  5. Doğan, U. (2021). A comparison of space quality in streets in the context of public open space design: The example of Izmir, Barcelona, and Liverpool. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(7), 1282–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1919018
  6. Haarhoff, E. (2023). Urban Morphology; Urban design theory and practice. University of Auckland.
  7. Hidayati, I., Yamu, C., & Tan, W. (2019). The emergence of mobility inequality in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia: A socio-spatial analysis of path dependencies in transport–land use policies. Sustainability, 11(18), 5115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185115
  8. Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the Machine: A configurational theory of architecture space syntax. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
  10. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
  11. Hillier, B., Yang, T., & Turner, A. (2012). Normalizing least angle choice in Depth map and how it opens new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. The Journal of Space Syntax, 3, 155–193.
  12. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
  13. Jiang, B., Claramunt, C., & Klarqvist, B. (2000). Integration of space syntax into GIS for modeling urban spaces. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoformation, 2(3-4), 161–171.
  14. Kalin, G. (1998). Selected Urban Landscapes (M. Tabibian, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  15. Karimi, K. (2012). A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Design International, 17, 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19
  16. Karimi, K. (2017). Space syntax: Consolidation and transformation of an urban research field. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1403177
  17. Koning, R. E., Roald, H. J., & van Nes, A. (2020). A scientific approach to the densification debate in Bergen Centre in Norway. Sustainability, 12(21), 9178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219178
  18. Koohsari, M. J., Oka, K., Owen, N., & Sugiyama, T. (2019). Natural movement: A space syntax theory linking urban form and function with walking for transport. Health & Place, 58, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.002
  19. Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (2017). The production of space. Blackwell.
  20. Lei, Y., Zhou, H., Xue, L., Yuan, L., Liu, Y., Wang, M., & Wang, C. (2024). Evaluating and comparing human perceptions of streets in two megacities by integrating street-view images, deep learning, and space syntax. Buildings, 14, 1847. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061847
  21. Lynch, K. (1979). The image of the city. MIT Press.
  22. (2023). Retrieved from https://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/ on December 18, 2023, at 17:30.
  23. Pinelo, J., & Turner, A. (2010). Introduction to UCL Depth map 10 Version 10.08.00r. UCL University Press.
  24. Sahin Körmeçli, P. (2023). Analysis of walkable street networks by using space syntax and GIS techniques: A case study of Çankırı City. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12060216
  25. Toker, U., Baran, P., & Mull, M. (2005). Suburban evolution: A cross-temporal analysis of spatial configuration in an American town (1989–2002). 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, June 13-17, Delft, Netherlands.
  26. Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31097
  27. Tzortzi, K. (2011). Space: Interconnecting museology and architecture. The Journal of Space Syntax, 2, 26–53.
  28. van Nes, A. (2009). Analyzing larger metropolitan areas: On identification criteria for middle-scale networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, 8–11.
  29. van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2020). Exploring challenges in space syntax theory building: The use of positivist and hermeneutic explanatory models. Sustainability, 12(17), 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177133
  30. van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Space syntax applied in urban practice. In A. van Nes & C. Yamu (Eds.), Introduction to space syntax in urban studies (pp. 213–237). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3_7
  31. Yamu, C., van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax - A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical applications. Sustainability, 13(6), 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
September 2024
Pages 213-232
  • Receive Date: 08 July 2024
  • Revise Date: 25 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 11 August 2024
  • First Publish Date: 16 September 2024
  • Publish Date: 16 September 2024