اولویت‌بندی عملکردهای طراحی‌‌‌شهری مؤثر بر عناصر فرم شهری به‌منظور افزایش اجتماع‌پذیری فضاهای عمومی (نمونه موردی: فضاهای عمومی کلان‌شهر شیراز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، ایران

10.22099/udsi.2024.51582.1010

چکیده

جمعیت شهرهای جهان با روندی غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی در حال افزایش است و این امر موجب شده تا فضاهای عمومی شهری، کیفیت خود را در حوزه‌های اجتماعی، فرهنگی، کالبدی، زیست‌محیطی و غیره، به قیمت افزایش صنعتی شدن درازای بهبود شرایط اقتصادی، از دست بدهند. در پی بروز کاهش کیفیت، شهروندان به‌جای حضور در فضاهای عمومی شهری، رسانه‌های اجتماعی برای ایجاد و پرورش ارتباطات برمی‌گزینند و یا صرفاً برای حضور اجباری از محیط‌های شهری عبور می‌کنند که این عوامل تبعات جبران‌ناپذیری را در پی خواهد داشت. در این راستا، پژوهش پیش رو در نظر دارد تا ضمن معرفی عملکردهای طراحی‌شهری مؤثر بر عناصر فرم شهری، آن‌ها را در راستای افزایش اجتماع‌پذیری فضاهای عمومی اولویت‌بندی نماید. این تحقیق به لحاظ هدف از نوع کاربردی بوده و روش آن توصیفی-تحلیلی می‌باشد و با رویکرد کمی-کیفی صورت پذیرفت. شیوه‌ی جمع‌آوری اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی انتخاب گردید و یافته‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌ی محقق‌ساخته و مصاحبه به‌دست آمد. نتایج آزمون تی حاکی از آن بود که در حال حاضر، حضور شهروندان به‌طور میانگین هفتگی با عدد 2.71، کمتر از حد متوسط است و مشخص نمود که نیازمند بهبود شرایط حاکم بر فضاهای عمومی می‌باشیم. همچنین این آزمون نشان داد که شهروندان شاخص‌های نوع دسترسی، ترافیک و کیفیت پیاده‌روها را به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین عامل حضور خود در فضاهای عمومی انتخاب نمودند. نتایج آزمون همبستگی پیرسون حاکی از آن بود که سایت‌ها با میزان همبستگی 0.612 و بتای 0.287 به‌دست‌آمده از آزمون رگرسیون، بیشترین میزان همبستگی و پیش‌بینی را به جهت افزایش اجتماع‌پذیری فضاهای عمومی شهری دارد. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، خلاصه‌ای از پیشنهادهای این پژوهش در راستای بهبود شرایط حاکم شامل؛ بهبود شبکه‌های حمل‌ونقل عمومی، بهبود کیفیت پیاده‌روها، افزایش سبزینگی محیط، بهره‌گیری از درختان مطابق با شرایط آب و هوایی منطقه، نماهای ساختمان‌ها مطابق بافرهنگ هر شهر، ایجاد سایه‌بان‌های متحرک و دیگر عوامل می‌باشد.

تازه های تحقیق

  • عناصر فرم شهری، بر اکثر عملکردهای طراحی شهری، مؤثر هستند.
  • وجود دید کافی و دسترسی به محیط اطراف، تأثیر بسزایی بر میزان حضور شهروندان در فضاهای عمومی دارد.
  • فرمول پیش‌بینی میزان حضور در فضاهای عمومی شهری، با توجه به تأثیر عناصر فرم شهری، ارائه گردیده است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prioritizing effective urban design functions on urban form elements in order to increase the sociability of public spaces (case example: public spaces of Shiraz metropolis)

نویسنده [English]

  • seyedeh aida hosseini
Doctoral researcher of Urbanism, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Iran
چکیده [English]

The population of the world's cities is increasing with an unpredictable trend, and this has caused the urban public spaces to lose their quality in the social, cultural, physical, environmental, etc. fields, at the cost of increasing industrialization along with the improvement of economic conditions. Following the decrease in quality, instead of being present in urban public spaces, citizens choose social media to create and cultivate communication, or pass through urban environments just to be forced to attend, which will lead to irreparable consequences. In this regard, the upcoming research intends to introduce urban design functions that are effective on urban form elements and prioritize them in order to increase the sociability of public spaces. This research is applied in terms of its purpose and its method is descriptive-analytical and it was done with a quantitative-qualitative approach. The method of collecting library and field information was chosen and the findings were obtained using a researcher-made questionnaire and interview. The results of the t-test indicated that currently, the average weekly attendance of citizens with a number of 2.71 is lower than the average, and indicated that we need to improve the conditions governing public spaces. Also, this test showed that the citizens chose the indicators of type of access, traffic and quality of sidewalks as the most important factors of their presence in public spaces. The results of the Pearson correlation test indicated that the sites with a correlation of 0.612 and a beta of 0.287 obtained from the regression test have the highest correlation and prediction to increase the sociability of urban public spaces. According to the obtained results, a summary of the suggestions of this research in order to improve the prevailing conditions includes; Improving public transportation networks, improving the quality of sidewalks, increasing the greenness of the environment, using trees in accordance with the weather conditions of the region, facades of buildings according to the culture of each city, creating movable shades and other factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban design functions
  • urban form elements
  • public spaces
  • Shiraz metropolis

مراجع

  1. Abd Elrahman, A. S., & Asaad, M. (2021). Urban design and urban planning: A critical analysis of the theoretical relationship gap. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12, 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.020
  2. Abdullah, A., Safizadeh, M., Hedayati, M., & Maghsoodi, M. J. (2021). The mediating role of sense of belonging in the relationship between the built environment and victimization: A case of Penang, Malaysia. Open House International, 46(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-11-2020-0164
  3. Ameen, R. F. M., Mourshed, M., & Li, H. (2015). A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.006
  4. Asaad, M., Khalifa, M., & Abd Elrahman, A. S. (2020). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in the urban design process: Towards multidisciplinary success considerations. In Urban and Transit Planning: A Culmination of Selected Research Papers from IEREK Conferences on Urban Planning, Architecture and Green Urbanism, Italy and Netherlands (2017) (pp. 261–274). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_25
  5. Askarizad, R., Lamíquiz, P., & Garau, C. (2024). The application of space syntax to enhance sociability in public urban spaces: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13, Article 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13070227
  6. Benn, S. I., & Gaus, G. F. (1983). Public and private in social life. Taylor & Francis.
  7. Biddulph, M. (2012). The problem with thinking about or for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251
  8. Blecic, I., Cecchini, A., & Trunfio, G. A. (2017). Computer-aided drafting of urban designs for walkability. In Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 695–709). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_51
  9. Carmona, M. (2010a). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design.
  10. Carmona, M. (2010b). Contemporary public space, part two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15(2), 157–173.
  11. Carmona, M., De Magalhães, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: The management dimension.
  12. Chokhachian, A., Perini, K., Giulini, S., & Auer, T. (2020). Urban performance and density: Generative study on interdependencies of urban form and environmental measures. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, Article 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101952
  13. Chow, K. L., & Ameijde, J. V. (2020). Generative housing communities: Design of participatory spaces in public housing using network configurational theories. In Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference, 2, 283–292.
  14. Coorey, B., & Coorey, A. (2017). Generating urban form. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA) 2017 (pp. 261–270).
  15. Coutu De Goede, S. (2024). Applying the Seven Generation Cities ethos to urban design: Reflections and pathways towards creating drastically inclusive, caring, and regenerative public places. Master's thesis, McGill University Institutional Digital Repository.
  16. Daher, E., Kubicki, S., & Guerriero, A. (2017). Data-driven development in the smart city: Generative design for refugee camps in Luxembourg. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4, 364–379. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(11)
  17. Duering, S., Chronis, A., & Koenig, R. (2020). Optimizing urban systems: Integrated optimization of spatial configurations. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD) (pp. 1–7).
  18. Elshani, D., Koenig, R., Duering, S., Schneider, S., & Chronis, A. (2021). Measuring sustainability and urban data operationalization: An integrated computational framework to evaluate and interpret the performance of the urban form. In Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference, 2, 407–416.
  19. Fedorova, S. (2021). GANs for urban design. SimAUD, 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.01727
  20. Franck, K., & Stevens, Q. (2006). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life.
  21. Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Chan, O. F., Chui, C. H. K., & Lum, T. Y. (2021). Objective and perceived built environment, sense of community, and mental wellbeing in older adults in Hong Kong: A multilevel structural equation study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 209, Article 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104058
  22. Hooper, P., Foster, S., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2020). Testing the impact of a planning policy based on New Urbanist planning principles on residents’ sense of community and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Environment and Behavior, 52(3), 305–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518798882
  23. Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities.
  24. Istrate, A.-L., & Chen, F. (2022). Liveable streets in Shanghai: Definition, characteristics and design. Progress in Planning, 158, Article 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2021.100544
  25. Jabareen, Y., & Zilberman, O. (2017). Sidestepping physical determinism in planning: The role of compactness, design and social perceptions in shaping sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x16636940
  26. Jia, J., Zhang, X., & Zhang, W. (2025). Between place attachment and urban planning in Jinan: Does environmental quality affect human perception in a developing country context? Land Use Policy, 148, Article 107384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107384
  27. Juntti, M., Costa, H., & Nascimento, N. (2021). Urban environmental quality and wellbeing in the context of incomplete urbanisation in Brazil: Integrating directly experienced ecosystem services into planning. Progress in Planning, 143, Article 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.003
  28. Karimi, K. (2023). The configurational structures of social spaces: Space syntax and urban morphology in the context of analytical, evidence-based design. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, Article 2084.
  29. Khallaf, M., & Jupp, J. (2017). Performance-based design of tall building envelopes using competing wind load and wind flow criteria. Procedia Engineering, 180, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.169
  30. Koenig, R., Miao, Y., Aichinger, A., Knecht, K., & Konieva, K. (2020). Integrating urban analysis, generative design, and evolutionary optimization for solving urban design problems. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47, 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894986
  31. Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighborhoods: The privatization of public space.
  32. Lei, Y., Wang, D., Jia, H., Li, J., Chen, J., Li, J., & Yang, Z. (2021). Multi-stage stochastic planning of regional integrated energy system based on scenario tree path optimization under long-term multiple uncertainties. Applied Energy, 300, Article 117224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117224
  33. Levy, J. M. (2016). Contemporary urban planning. Taylor & Francis.
  34. Li, J., Dang, A., & Song, Y. (2022). Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness. Journal of Urban Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005
  35. Lima, F., Brown, N., & Duarte, J. (2021). Urban design optimization: Generative approaches towards urban fabrics with improved transit accessibility and walkability. In Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference (pp. 719–728).
  36. Liu, J., Meng, B., Wang, J., Chen, S., Tian, B., & Zhi, G. (2021). Exploring the spatiotemporal patterns of residents’ daily activities using text-based social media data: A case study of Beijing, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(6), 389.
  37. Low, S., & Smith, N. (2013). The politics of public space.
  38. Marsault, X., & Torres, F. (2019). An interactive and generative eco-design tool for architects in the sketch phase. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1343. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1343/1/012136
  39. Mehta, V. (2019). Streets and social life in cities: A taxonomy of sociability. Urban Design, 24, 16–37.
  40. Mehta, V., & Palazzo, D. (2020). Companion to public space.
  41. Mukkavaara, J., & Sandberg, M. (2020). Architectural design exploration using generative design: Framework development and case study of a residential block. Buildings, 10, Article 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10110201
  42. Nagy, D., Villaggi, L., & Benjamin, D. (2018). Generative urban design: Integrating financial and energy goals for automated neighborhood layout. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD) (pp. 1–8).
  43. Natanian, J., & Wortmann, T. (2021). Simplified evaluation metrics for generative energy-driven urban design: A morphological study of residential blocks in Tel Aviv. Energy and Buildings, 240, Article 110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110916
  44. Oliveira, V. (2016). Urban morphology, The Urban Book Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0
  45. Owaki, T., & Machida, T. (2020). RoadNetGAN: Generating road networks in planar graph representation. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 535–543). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63820-7_61
  46. Pérez-Martínez, I., Martínez-Rojas, M., & Soto-Hidalgo, J. M. (2020). A preliminary approach to allocate categories of buildings into lands based on generative design. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ48607.2020.9177853
  47. Quan, S. J., Park, J., Economou, A., & Lee, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence-aided design: Smart design for sustainable city development. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 46, 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319867946
  48. Rahimian, M. (2019). A grammar-based generative urban design tool considering topographic constraints - The case for American urban planning. In Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 267–276). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2019.3.267
  49. Ramos-Vidal, I., & Domínguez de la Ossa, E. (2023). A systematic review to determine the role of public space and urban design on sense of community. Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Repositorio Institucional UTB. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12565
  50. Rugel, E. J., Carpiano, R. M., Henderson, S. B., & Brauer, M. (2019). Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region. Environmental Research, 171, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.034
  51. Saadallah, D. M. (2020). Utilizing participatory mapping and PPGIS to examine the activities of local communities. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(1), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.038
  52. Serdar, S. E., & Kaya, M. E. (2019). Generative landscape modeling in urban open space design: An experimental approach. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 231–238.
  53. Showkatbakhsh, M., & Makki, M. (2020). Application of homeostatic principles within evolutionary design processes: Adaptive urban tissues. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaa002
  54. Stroope, J. (2021). Active transportation and social capital: The association between walking or biking for transportation and community participation. Preventive Medicine, 150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106666
  55. Tian, R. (2021). Suggestive site planning with conditional GAN and urban GIS data. In Proceedings of the 2020 Digital Futures (pp. 103–113). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4400-6_10
  56. Vanoutrive, T. (2017). Don’t think of them as roads. Think of them as road transport markets: Congestion pricing as a neoliberal political project. Progress in Planning, 117, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2016.04.001
  57. Varna, G. (2014). Measuring public space: The star model. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
  58. Wang, X., Song, Y., & Tang, P. (2020). Generative urban design using shape grammar and block morphological analysis. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9, 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.09.001
  59. Wilson, L., Danforth, J., Davila, C. C., & Harvey, D. (2019). How to generate a thousand master plans: A framework for computational urban design. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD) (pp. 113–119). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3390098.3390126
  60. Wong, K. K. C., & Ameijde, J. V. (2021). In-between spaces: Data-driven analysis and generative design for public housing estate layouts. In Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 397–406).
  61. Yang, P. P.-J., Chang, S., Saha, N., & Chen, H. W. (2020). Data-driven planning support system for a campus design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47, 1474–1489. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320910164
  62. Young, I. M. (1986). The ideal of community and the politics of difference. Social Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1–26.
  63. Yu, A. (2021). Open space and sense of community of older adults: A study in a residential area in Hong Kong. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(3), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2020-0260
  64. Yu, R., Wong, M., & Woo, J. (2019). Perceptions of neighborhood environment, sense of community, and self-rated health: An age-friendly city project in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Health, 96(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-00331-3
  65. Zhang, F., Loo, B. P., & Wang, B. (2022). Aging in place: From the neighborhood environment, sense of community, to life satisfaction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(5), 1484–1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1985954

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 12 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 26 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار: 26 شهریور 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار