Definition of Participative Urban Design Paradigm in The Community-led Urban Regeneration Based on Islamic Realism Philosophy

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Islamic Art,Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

During the evolution of the urban regeneration approach, attention to social participation has led to formation of community-Led urban regeneration. Social participation can improve social capital, sense of place and responsibility to the place, through community-Led urban regeneration process. As the art of qualifying public spaces, its activities’ platform is urban environment and space, given the social, ethnic and historical features of citizens and structural and physical requirements, urban design tends to make the urban space more at the service of the people and in this regard, in addition to the welfare of citizens, meet their emotional and psychological needs. Urban design focused on making places for people and the process of creating a better place for people. The main emphasis in urban design issues such as creating a place of interdisciplinary, public areas, group activities, interactive creation and social justice and civil participation. needs of public participation in improvement of cities status is not unknown. Based on the views of the theorists, social participation can also create social sustainability. Since the sufficient skills and knowledge are needed to take apart in decision making process with the aim of social participation in local development projects and urban spaces designing, it seems that the lack of educating and training required was due to failure social participation during urban regeneration projects. Due to the nature of this approach and intervention platform, the position of education must be clarified in this process. There are many instruments to use during this intervention, but the rule of education is not clarified in this process, yet. Disregarding for the role of residents who live in urban neighbors is the most important reason of failure to implement urban space design development projects with high quality in Iran. It is the result of lack of planning to attract participation neither teaching them, not to learn all people with the aim transferring experiences and to make appropriate methods to paradigm shift in the participants, on the other hand there are not enough awareness and expertise in the urban manager groups and the administrative experts. In addition, it is necessary to produce conceptual framework for educating, training and learning citizens based on creed, native culture and identity of Islamic-Iranian society. This study includes specifying the position of social education during common participation attraction process and also making clear the theoretical and philosophical basis of Islamic Ideology about social education with emphasized on the role of community and participation concept in the procedure of urban designing. Gathering data has been done with questionnaire, interview, and field study. This study is applied research and done with descriptive and analytical methods. The results show there is a significant positive relationship between social education and sustainable urban regeneration. It is therefore suggested that educating residents will be set as the target of sustainable urban regeneration plans as a pivotal element of urban designing and making decision. Finally, the results of study representative that based on Islamic realistic philosophy, the paradigm is educating and training from society and for society are the main purpose. The conclusion shows that educating and training to society have no expected results. The values of this society have been specified based on anthropology. With the aim of explaining the relationship between education-training and urban regeneration and also defining its role and position in the community-led urban regeneration process, in this study by using qualitative analysis and content analysis method, theories have been reviewed to compose the community-led urban regeneration through training. The results of study contain investigating the participatory approach as a designing paradigm will lead to the success of urban regeneration projects and there is an important issue that social training and social educating are not only instruments to achieve urban regeneration objectives but those should be considered as executables to attract citizen’s participation. In addition, the training and educating will be assumed as means to achieve enabling, empowering, capacity building and institutionalization for urban projects beneficiaries. In this study the theories are divided into two categories based on their nature. The first one contains the viewpoints about the relation between education and participation in common. And the other on contains the theories that includes philosophy of education in Islamic-Realism. According on research findings it is obvious that over the past decade, along with changing the view of environmental sustainability to social sustainability, education and training are implemented to building capacity and social empowerment with aim to increase social capacity. These all lead to increase social participation and common abilities to take apart in local development and urban space designing. The citizens who are educated and trained enough, are ready to participate in decision making, designing and implementation of urban regeneration projects. Finally, community-led urban regeneration can happen with the building capacity through education and training continuously. Likewise, in order to Islamic thought’s nature about social education and training and social behaviors in the community, defining the aims, principles, methods and contents of social education and training affected Islamic thought organize the main purposes of this study. The method of this research as its purpose is decisive and based on its social science nature is descriptive. With the purpose to define attribute of social education and training affected Islamic theology, two viewpoints are compared: Islamic Realistic philosophy and its Etebariat theory versus some theories about participation in urbanism and urban planning those have been based on social education and training. There are hierarchical aims based on Islamic philosophy and in accordance with these goals, the characteristics of education to the community have been explained. In general, despite the differences in the titles used to explain the theoretical and philosophical foundations of each of the two views there are similarities in the general orientation of explaining the role of education and training to the community to strengthen social responsibility and participation in both perspectives. As a final conclusion, it should be said that conscious participate urban design requires education, which should be explained in the context of the Islamic worldview and the principles of education in Islam. Based on case study surveying it revealed the education and training can improve the achievements and participation goals. During the implementation of this project tradesman refused to participate at the first, then, after some negotiation and explanation about the probable rewards and especially receiving their opinions about the priorities in infrastructure, space design, urban furniture, planting, facades, shades and materials for pedestrian flooring, they decided to be a part of this project.

Highlights

  • Based on the findings of this research, community-Led urban regeneration is an impactful approach for the successful implementation of participatory urban design projects in historical contexts.
  • Engaging local communities (stakeholders) and the target audience of urban space design projects depends on providing social education.
  • Determining the benefits for each local actor in the community-Led urban design process is one of the most important and impactful actions.
  • The philosophical foundations of Islamic realism determine the principles of social education in the process of engaging public participation.

In the urban space design project aimed at regenerating the historical Zone of Shiraz, the participation of shopkeepers and stakeholders increased after announcing the necessary incentives to create added value for properties and business rights.

Keywords


  1. Abdi Danshpur, Z. (2015). Introduction to planning theories with a special focus on urban planning (3rd ed.). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [In Persian].
  2. Alavitar, A. (2003). Exploring citizen participation models in urban governance (Vol. 2). Municipalities Organization. [In Persian].
  3. Assefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy. Technologies in Society Journal, 29, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.01.012
  4. Bahrini, S. H., Izadi, M. S., & Mofidi, M. (2014). Approaches and policies of urban renewal (from reconstruction to sustainable urban regeneration). Urban Studies, 9, 17–28. [In Persian].
  5. Baker, M., Coaffee, J., & Sherriff, G. (2006). Achieving successful participation: Literature review. Department for Communities and Local Government.
  6. Bevilacqua, C., Calabro, J., & Maione, C. (2013). The role of community in urban regeneration: Mixed use area approach in USA. In Proceeding REAL CORP 2013 (pp. 20-23). Rome: Tagungsband.
  7. Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city. Island Press.
  8. Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban regeneration & social sustainability: Best practice from European cities. Wiley-Blackwell.
  9. Goteck, J. A. (2001). Philosophical schools and educational thoughts (M. Pak Seresht, Trans.). Tehran: Samt Press. [In Persian].
  10. Habibi, M., & Saeidi Rezvani, N. (2005). Participatory urban planning: A theoretical exploration in the context of Iran. Fine Arts Journal, 24, 15–24. [In Persian].
  11. Hanachi, P. (2012). Urban restoration in historical fabrics of Iran. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  12. Hanachi, P., & Fadaei Nejad, S. (2011). Development of a conceptual framework for the preservation and integrated regeneration in cultural-historical fabrics. Fine Arts Journal, 46, 15–26. [In Persian].
  13. Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
  14. Hillier, J. (2010). Shadows of power: A story of foresight in land use planning (K. Pouladi, Trans.). Tehran: Publications of Iranian Society of Consulting Engineers.
  15. Hosseini, S. J. (2008). Sustainable public participation in the renovation and regeneration of decayed urban fabrics. Mashhad: Sokhan Gostar Press. [In Persian].
  16. Islami, G., & Kamel-Nia, H. (2013). Collective architecture: From theory to practice. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  17. Izadi, M. S. (2006). A study on city center regeneration: A comparative analysis of two different approaches to the revitalization of historic city centers in Iran (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).
  18. Large Scale Urban Distressed Areas (LUDA). (2003). Appraisal of urban rehabilitation literature and projects, including a glossary of terms and a preliminary set of indicators characterizing LUDA. Dresden.
  19. Maleki, H. (2005). Islamic education: A macro-level approach. Tehran: Abed Press. [In Persian].
  20. Mangen, A. P. (2011). Social exclusion and problematic areas of Europe: Urban renewal management (A. Aghvami Moghaddam, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  21. McCarthy, J. (2011). Partnership, collaborative planning, and urban regeneration (M. Khalilnejadi, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  22. McDonald, S., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2009). Urban regeneration for sustainable communities: A case study. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.49-59
  23. Misbah Yazdi, M. T. (1981). Educational goals from the Islamic perspective. Tehran: Samt Press. [In Persian].
  24. Misbah Yazdi, M. T. (2003). Islamic legal theory: The reciprocal rights of people and government (M. Naderi & M. Karimi-Nia, Trans., Vol. 1 & 2, 1st ed.). Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Press. [In Persian].
  25. Motahari, M. (1995). A journey through the life of the Prophet Muhammad. Tehran: Sadra Press. [In Persian].
  26. Motahari, M. (2001). Fitrah. Tehran: Sadra Press. [In Persian].
  27. Nabavian, S. M. (2009). Philosophy of rights. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Press. [In Persian].
  28. Nedaei, H. (1995). A brief review of the foundations of education in Islamic realism: The impact of philosophical concepts on different aspects of education. Misbah Scientific Journal, 4(15), 7–16. [In Persian].
  29. Petts, J., & Leach, B. (2000). Evaluation methods for public participation: Literature review. Environment Agency.
  30. Pourahmad, E., Habibi, K., & Keshavarz, M. (2010). Evolution of urban regeneration as a new approach in decayed urban fabrics. Iranian Islamic City Studies Journal, 1, 53–55. [In Persian].
  31. Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition, and purpose of urban regeneration. In A handbook, British Urban Regeneration Association. London: SAGE Publications.
  32. Salehi, E., Moradi, E., & Firouzi, E. (2015). A comprehensive look at Islamic education from the perspective of martyr Morteza Motahari with emphasis on its principles, goals, and educational methods. Journal of Research on Islamic Education, 22(25), 9–37. [In Persian].
  33. Sharafi, M., & Barkpour, N. (2010). Typology of citizen participation techniques in urban planning based on different levels of participation. Architecture and Urbanism Letter, 2(4), 77–101. [In Persian].
  34. Shari'atmadari, A. (1964). Education and training. Educational Journal, 1, 1–10. [In Persian].
  35. Shari'atmadari, A. (1996). Philosophical epistemology and education. Culture Academy Journal, 3(5), 1–16. [In Persian].
  36. Sharifian Sani, M. (2001). Urban culture: Citizen participation, urban governance, and urban management. Urban Management Journal, 8, 42–55. [In Persian].
  37. Tabatabai, M. H. (1982). Al-Mizan commentary (N. Makarem Shirazi, Trans., Vol. 20). Tehran: Allameh Foundation Press. [In Persian].
  38. Tabatabai, M. H. (1991). Nihayat al-Hikmah (S. Shirvani, Trans., Vol. 1). Tehran: Al-Zahra Press. [In Persian].
  39. Tabatabai, M. H. (2006). Principles of philosophy and the method of realism (Vols. 1–3). Qom: Sadra Press. [In Persian].
  40. Turok, I. (2004). Urban regeneration: What can be done and what should be avoided? Proceedings of the Istanbul Conference on Urban Regeneration. Istanbul: Lutfi Kirdar Exhibition Centre.
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
September 2024
Pages 33-54
  • Receive Date: 27 June 2024
  • Revise Date: 10 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 24 July 2024
  • First Publish Date: 16 September 2024
  • Publish Date: 16 September 2024