Bottom-up Urban Design is a novel approach in urban planning that involves direct citizen participation in decision-making and defining local projects. The "Mahalleh Ma" project in Mashhad, as an implemented example of this approach, aimed to enhance citizen engagement and improve urban management performance through surveys and public hearings. This article examines the challenges and opportunities of implementing this project in a centralized socio-political environment. Obstacles such as initial resistance from municipal managers, practical concerns about the feasibility of citizen-proposed projects, and the diverse needs of various population groups were observed throughout the project. However, with consistent support from cultural managers and the city council, as well as the use of effective communication strategies, the project achieved partial success. On the other hand, opportunities such as increased public trust, improved cooperation between citizens and local authorities, and enhanced neighborhood livability were notable outcomes of this participatory approach. This study, through qualitative analysis of data collected from interviews and questionnaires with citizens, experts, and facilitation groups, provides lessons for other cities and regions intending to implement similar models. The findings suggest that by establishing appropriate participatory structures, it is possible to achieve improved urban planning and sustainable development even in centralized environments.
Highlights
The "Mahalleh Ma" project in Mashhad is a pioneering participatory urban design experience.
Cultural and structural challenges emphasized the importance of effective needs assessment in participatory planning and design.
The findings indicate a 74.2% increase in public trust in urban management post-implementation.
Facilitation in this project proved to be a vital tool for engaging citizens effectively.
The recommendations provide a scalable model for participatory planning and design of urban spaces in other cities.
Agger, A. (2017). Transparency in participatory processes: A tool for better governance? Journal of Public Administration, 203.
Arnstein S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners (JAIP), 35 (4), 216-224.
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2020). Popular democracy: The paradox of participation. Stanford University Press.
Brownill, S. (2009). The Dynamics of Participation: Modes of Governance and Increasing Participation in Planning. Urban Policy and Research, 27 (4), pp. 357-375.
Conrad, E., Cassar, L. F., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011). Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, pp. 761-782.
Fainstein, S. S., & DeFilippis, J. (2016). Readings in planning theory (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
Gaventa, J., & Valderrama, C. (1999).Participation, Citizenship and Local Governance. Background Note Prepared for Workshop on ‘Strengthening Participation in Local Governance’, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Brighton, June 21-24, 1999.
Gordon, E., Schirra, S., & Hollander, J. (2011). Immersive Planning: A Conceptual Model for Designing Public Participation with New Technologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,38, 505-519.
Khan, S., & Swapan, M. S. H. (2013). From Blueprint Master Plans to Democratic Planning in South Asian Cities: Pursuing Good Governance Agenda against Prevalent Patron-client Networks.Habitat International, 38, pp. 183-191.
Laurian, L. & Shaw, M. M. (2009). Evaluation of Public Participation; the Practices of Certified Planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, pp. 293-309.
Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (2), 275-293.
Michels, A., & de Graaf, L. (2017). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory governance. Public Administration Review, 289.
Naderi, A., Shirali, E., & Ghasemi Kafroudi, S. (2014). Investigating the sense of neighborhood belonging and its role in social participation (case study: Nematabad neighborhood). Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, Vol. 6, (3), 20-7.
Williams, G. (2004). Evaluating Participatory Development: Tyranny, Power and (re)Politicisation. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 557-578.
Alikhani, A. (2025). Challenges and opportunities of implementing urban space design strategies with a bottom-up approach: Insights from the "Mahalleh Ma" Project in Mashhad. Iranian Urban Design Studies, 1(2), 101-124. doi: 10.22099/iuds.2025.51722.1016
MLA
Alikhani, A. . "Challenges and opportunities of implementing urban space design strategies with a bottom-up approach: Insights from the "Mahalleh Ma" Project in Mashhad", Iranian Urban Design Studies, 1, 2, 2025, 101-124. doi: 10.22099/iuds.2025.51722.1016
HARVARD
Alikhani, A. (2025). 'Challenges and opportunities of implementing urban space design strategies with a bottom-up approach: Insights from the "Mahalleh Ma" Project in Mashhad', Iranian Urban Design Studies, 1(2), pp. 101-124. doi: 10.22099/iuds.2025.51722.1016
CHICAGO
A. Alikhani, "Challenges and opportunities of implementing urban space design strategies with a bottom-up approach: Insights from the "Mahalleh Ma" Project in Mashhad," Iranian Urban Design Studies, 1 2 (2025): 101-124, doi: 10.22099/iuds.2025.51722.1016
VANCOUVER
Alikhani, A. Challenges and opportunities of implementing urban space design strategies with a bottom-up approach: Insights from the "Mahalleh Ma" Project in Mashhad. Iranian Urban Design Studies, 2025; 1(2): 101-124. doi: 10.22099/iuds.2025.51722.1016
)