Exploring the Impacts of Technology on Enhancing the Quality of Urban Public Spaces within the Framework of Smart Cities, Case Study: Iran Mall, Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The advance of information and communication technologies and digitalization has led to significant transformations in cities and urban life dimensions. Technology is recognized as a facilitator of processes and an enhancer of urban quality of life, particularly in public spaces. The emergence of the smart city concept as an urban policy and dominant paradigm reflects these transformative impacts. This study aims to explore the influence of technology on the theoretical and practical domains of cities through a qualitative approach and thematic literature review, with an emphasis on enhancing the quality of urban public spaces in smart city framework. The study examines the macro and micro impacts of technology in cities, with a focus on the smart city paradigm. Iran Mall has been selected as the case study to analyze the theoretical and practical impacts of technology on its public spaces.
The findings indicate that, theoretically, technology has led to the development of new urban theories, including digital cities, cyber cities, creative cities, knowledge-based cities, learning cities, and, notably, the smart city as the prevailing discourse. Practically, technology can address urban challenges across various dimensions, such as economic, social, transportation, environmental, and governance aspects. At the micro scale, technology enhances the connection between humans, spaces, and technology in urban smart spaces, resulting in improved quality of life in public spaces. The case study of Iran Mall illustrates the realization of these concepts on both macro and micro scales, where advanced technologies are integrated into physical structures and urban functions, enhancing the urban experience for visitors. Finally, practical recommendations are provided to improve the performance of Iran Mall and maximize the potential of existing technologies based on the research findings.

Highlights

  • At the macro scale, the effects of technology on different dimensions of cities are evident, both in theoretical (emergence of new urban theories) and practical (addressing urban challenges in various dimensions) domains.
  • At the micro scale, the effects of technology are defined in theoretical (smart urban spaces) and practical (enhancing the quality of urban public spaces) contexts.
  • The smart city, as the dominant paradigm of the digital age, significantly influences various aspects of urban life. Smart urban spaces are undergoing transformation through the relationship between humans, space, and technology, facilitated by location-based services, internet access, and mobile platforms in social media.

Keywords

References

  • Abdel-Aziz, A., Abdel-Salam, H. and El-Sayad, Z. (2015). The Role of ICTs in Creating the New Social Public Place of the Digital Era. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 487–493.
  • Albino, V., Berardi, U. & Dangelico, R.M. (2015). Smart Cities Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21.
  • Alizadeh, H., & Sharifi, A. (2023). Toward a societal smart city: Clarifying the social justice dimension of smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 95, 104612.
  • Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A Conjuncture of Four Forces. Cities, 47, 95-106.
  • Anthopoulos, L (2016). Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005.
  • Asadi, R., Bandarabad, A., & Modiri, A. (2023). Explaining public space changes in the technology paradigm based on Cremona’s urban design dimensions. Urban Design Discourse, 4(1), 27–44. [in Persian].
  • Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
  • Buallay, A; Khoury, R & Hamdan, A. (2021). Sustainability reporting in smart cities: A multidimensional performance measures. cities, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103397.
  • Calzada, I. & Cobo, C. (2015). Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City. The Society of Urban Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971535.
  • Camero, A. Alba, e. (2019). Smart City and information technology: A review. Cities, 93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014.
  • Caprotti, F. (2018). Spaces of visibility in the smart city: Flagship urban spaces and the smart urban imaginary. Urban studies, DOI: 10.1177/0042098018798597.
  • Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2), 65-82.
  • Carmona, M. (2008). Public Space: The Management Dimension. London: Routledge.
  • Carrillo, F.J. (2006). Knowledge cities. Oxford: Elsevier Inc.
  • Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society, the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Chauhan, C., Agarwal, N. & kar, A.K. (2016). Addressing big data challenges in smart cities: a systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-03-2016-0012.
  • Chauhan, C., Agarwal, N. & kar, A.K. (2016). Addressing big data challenges in smart cities: a systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-03-2016-0012.
  • Chen, Z., Gan, W., Wu, J., Lin, H., & Chen, C. M. (2024). Metaverse for smart cities: A surveys. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems.
  • Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Dameri, R.P. and Rosenthal-Sabroux, C., Eds., Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, Springer, Cham, 13-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2.
  • Dahmane, W. M., Ouchani, S., & Bouarfa, H. (2024). Smart cities services and solutions: A systematic review. Data and Information Management, 100087.
  • Dai, Y., Hasanefendic, S., & Bossink, B. (2024). A systematic literature review of the smart city transformation process: The role and interaction of stakeholders and technology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105112
  • Dameri, R.P. (2017). Using ICT in Smart City in Smart City Implementation, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45766-6_3.
  • De Falco, S (2019). Digital and urban spaces: Oxymoron or binomial? Urban transformations in the digital era. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12467.
  • Downey, J., and McGuigan, J. (1999). Techno Cities. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
  • Dutton, W.H. (1987). Wired Cities: Shaping the Future of Communications. London: Macmillan.
  • Elassy, M., Al-Hattab, M., Takruri, M., & Badawi, S. (2024). Intelligent transportation systems for sustainable smart cities. Transportation Engineering, 100252.
  • Fatty, T. (1991). Telecity: Information Technology and Its Impact on City Form. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
  • Finger, M. & Razaghi, M. (2017). Conceptualizing “Smart Cities”. Informatics Spectrum, 40 (1).
  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Harper Business.
  • Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N. and Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities–Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna, UT: Centre of Regional Science. From: ⟨http://www.smart-cities.eu⟩.
  • Gómez-Carmona, O., Casado-Mansilla, D., & López-de-Ipiña, D. (2018, November). Multifunctional interactive furniture for smart cities. In Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 19, p. 1212). MDPI.
  • Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (1999). Planning Cyber Cities. Town Planning Review, 1, 89 –114.
  • Hampton, K., Livio, O. & Goulet, L. (2010). The Social Life of Wireless Urban Spaces: Internet Use, Social Networks, and the Public Realm. Journal of Communication, 60, 701–722.
  • Harrison, C. Donnelly, I.A. (2012). A Theory of Smart Cities. Retrieved http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/view/1703/572.
  • Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Hatami, A., Sasanpour, F., Ziparo, A., & Soleimani, M. (2021). Sustainable smart city: Concepts, dimensions, and indicators. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 60(21). [in Persian].
  • Hosseini, A., Farhadi, E., Joshanpour, M., & Taibi, A. (2022). A multidimensional analysis of smart city indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Mashhad. Urban Environment Planning and Development, 2(7), 79–94. [in Persian].
  • Hui, C. X., Dan, G., Alamri, S., & Toghraie, D. (2023). Greening smart cities: An investigation of the integration of urban natural resources and smart city technologies for promoting environmental sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104985
  • ITU-T Technology Watch. (2013). Smart City, Seoul: A Case Study. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/23/01/T23010000190001PDFE.pdf.
  • Jasim, N. A., TH, H., & Rikabi, S. A. (2021). Design and Implementation of Smart City Applications Based on the Internet of Things. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.22331
  • Karadag, t. (2013). An Evaluation of the Smart City Approach (Master thesis). Middle East Technical University.
  • Khan, A., Aslam, S., Aurangzeb, K., Alhussein, M., & Javaid, N. (2022). Multiscale modeling in smart cities: A survey on applications, current trends, and challenges. Sustainable cities and society, 78, 103517.
  • Knox, K., Boychenko, I., & Platunina, G. (2023, November). Interactive space design and behaviour influence on smart city scale. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2948, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
  • Komninos, N. (2008). Intelligent cities and globalization of innovation networks. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Kuikkaniemi, k, Jacucci, G., Turpeinen, M, Hoggan, E, Muller, J (2011). From Space to Stage: How Interactive Screens Will Change Urban Life. Computer44(6):40-47.
  • Kumar, H, Singh, M.K, Gupta, M.P, Madaan, J. (2018). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024.
  • Kummitha, K. & Crutzenb, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67, 43–52.
  • Kummitha, K. & Crutzenb, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67, 43–52.
  • Liu, D., Lee, T. and Gao, Ch. (2014). A Study of Digitization Strategies for Realizing Sustainable Life. World SB 14 Barcelona conference.
  • McLuhan, M. and Powers, B. R. (1992). The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century (Communication and Society). Oxford University Press; Reprint edition.
  • Mela, A. (2014). Urban public space between fragmentation, control and conflict. City, Territory and Architecture, 1(15). http://www.cityterritoryarchitecture.com/content/1/1/15
  • Miltiadis D., Lytras, M. & Visvizi, A. (2018). Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research. Sustainability, 10(6).
  • Mitchell, W. (1999). E-topic: "Urban Life, JIM-But Not as We Know It". Cambridge, Mass: the MIT press.
  • Moradi, Sh. (2019). A thematic review of smart city studies. Bibliometric Research Journal, 5(9), 139–160. [in Persian].
  • Mosannenzadeh, F. and Vettoratob, D. (2014). Defining Smart City: A Conceptual Framework Based on Keyword Analysis. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/2523.
  • Nam, T. &Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Digital Government Research Confer33.ence, College Park, Maryland, June 12-15.
  • Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Hataminejad, H., & Parsa, Sh. (2018). Smart city: Explaining the necessities and requirements—Tehran’s pathway to smartness. New Approaches in Human Geography, 10(38), 1–32. [in Persian].
  • PPS, Technology Brings People Together in Public Spaces After All. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/technology-brings-people-together-public-spaces-after-all/289076/. (Accessed 3.2.18).
  • Rjab, A. B., Mellouli, S., & Corbett, J. (2023). Barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in smart cities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101814.
  • Romãoa, J., Kourtitb, K. Neutsd, B. & Nijkamp, P. (2017). The smart city as a common place for tourists and residents: A structural analysis of the determinants of urban attractiveness. Cities, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.007.
  • Schuler, D. (2002). Digital cities and digital citizens. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, T. Ishida (Eds.) Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 71–85). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. UK: penguin books.
  • Shami, M. R., Bigdelirad, V., & Moeinifar, M. (2021). Explaining smart city concepts and evaluating its dimensions with an emphasis on smart urban living in Tehran metropolis. Geography (Regional Planning), 11(45), 137–151. [in Persian].
  • Shepard, M. (2011). Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Silva, B.N., Khan, M. and Han, k. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 697–713.
  • Steenbruggen, J., et al. (2014). Data from mobile phone operators: A tool for smarter cities. Telecommunications Policy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.001i.
  • Streitz, N. (2018). Beyond ‘smart-only’ cities: redefining the ‘smart-everything’ paradigm. Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0824-1.
  • Toffler, A. (1984). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam.
  • Toscano, P. (2017). Instagram-city: New media, and the social perception of public spaces. Visual Anthropology, 30(3), 275-286.
  • Townsend, A. M. (2000). Life in the Real-time City: Mobile Telephones and Urban Metabolism. Journal of Urban Technology, 7, pp 85–104.
  • Trencher, G. (2018). Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033.
  • Willis, K. S. (2017). Netspaces: Space and place in a networked world. Taylor & Francis.
  • Xiao, X., & Xie, C. (2021). Rational planning and urban governance based on smart cities and big data. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 21, 101381.
  • Yigitcanlara et al. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003.
  • Zhao, F; Fashola, O; Olarewaju, T & Onwumere, L. (2021). Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review. cities, 19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103406.
  • Zimmerman et al. (2014). A Theoretical Model for Digital Reverberations of City Spaces and Public Places. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 10(1), 46-62.
  • Zimmermann, J., Happes, J., & Bergis, N. (2019). Transformation and continuity in urban space: The smartphone as a companion to digital teaching and learning processes in extracurricular learning settings. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 11(2), 30-44. https://www.iranmall.com/ [Accessed: 1/19/2025].
Iranian Urban Design Studies
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
January 2025
Pages 183-210

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 October 2024
  • Revise Date: 03 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 01 December 2024
  • First Publish Date: 19 January 2025
  • Publish Date: 19 January 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics