Towards Critical Mobilinguistics: Conceptual Metaphors and Discursive Mechanisms Shaping Urban Cycling Futures in Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Author

PhD Researcher in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran- PhD Fellow at Urban Cycling Institute, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Movement in the city is not merely a functional activity aimed at traveling from point A to point B, as conceived within transportation engineering. Rather, it is a fluid, multidimensional, and entangled practice that acquires meaning through its embeddedness in environmental, cultural, social, economic, and political contexts within the fabric of everyday life and through individuals’ lived mobile experiences.
In urban studies and urban design, research exploring individuals’ lived experiences of mobility in the city is an emerging field situated at the intersection of urbanism, anthropology, phenomenology, and mobility studies. From this perspective, inquiries into the lived experience of urban cycling address a fundamental question: how do individuals experience cycling in different urban contexts and spaces?
Within this framework, the present study seeks to understand and describe the role of the body in the lived experience of urban cycling in a specific urban context, continuing a line of inquiry in the phenomenology of movement and the phenomenology of the body. Using mobile autoethnography, the study examines the first author’s embodied experience of cycling in Amsterdam, a bicycle-friendly city, across different temporal and spatial conditions.
The findings reveal seven interrelated themes that, through autoethnographic description and analysis, illuminate the entanglement of the body, the bicycle, and the urban environment in lived experience. These themes demonstrate that the body, as the medium of experience, plays an active and constitutive role in shaping one’s interaction with space, self, and others. Such relations are mediated by environmental and climatic characteristics, mobility systems and planning policies, cultural dimensions, and both formal and informal norms, producing diverse lived experiences of urban cycling across different urban contexts. In the final section, this research provides recommendations for future Iranian urban design studies.

Highlights

  • Proposes Critical Mobilinguistics as an emerging research field in urban mobility studies.
  • Examines how vernacular statements about cycling in Tehran shape mobility imaginaries.
  • Identifies discursive strategies that delegitimize cycling and reinforce automobility regimes in Tehran.
  • Highlights the role of language in constraining urban cycling futures in Tehran.
  • Emphasizes the need for linguistic interventions in sustainable mobility transitions.

Keywords

References

Adams, J. (1999). The social implications of hypermobility. OECD Proceedings: Social Sciences. OECD.
Agamben, G. 2014. “What Is a Destituent Power?” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 32 (1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3201tra.
Aldred, R., Croft, J., & Goodman, A. (2019). Impacts of an active travel intervention with a cycling focus in outer London: A longitudinal study. Journal of Transport & Health, 12, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.01.004
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
Böhm, S., Jones, C., Land, C., & Paterson, M. (2006). Against automobility. The Sociological Review, 54(s1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00619.x
Bonham, J., & Cox, P. (2010). The disruptive traveller? A Foucauldian analysis of cycleways. Road & Transport Research, 19(2), 42–53.
Braun, B., & Randell, S. (2022). Political economies of automobility. Environment and Planning A.
Braun, R. 2019. “Autonomous Vehicles: From Science Fiction to Sustainable Future.” In Mobilities, Literature, Culture, edited by M. Aguiar, C. Mathieson, and L. Pearce, 259–280, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Vis, B. (2019). Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: a meta-analysis. Language and Cognition, 11(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.5
Buehler, R., & Dill, J. (2016). Bikeway networks: A review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
Caimotto, M. C. (2020). Discourses of cycling, road users and sustainable mobility: An ecolinguistic investigation. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, Palgrave Macmillan.
Caimotto, M. C. (2023). “Cycling is good” but “cyclists are reckless.” Journal of Language and Discrimination, 7(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.24428
Cass, N., & K. Manderscheid. (2018). “The Autonomobility System: Mobility Justice and Freedom under Sustainability.” In Mobilities, Mobility Justice and Social Justice, edited by N. Cook and D. Butz, 101–115. London, New York: Routledge.
Copenhagenize Index. (2025). The Copenhagenize index of bicycle-friendly cities. Copenhagenize Design Company.
Cox, P. (Ed.). (2015). Cycling Cultures. Chester: University of Chester Press.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern Western world. Routledge.
Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
De Hartog, J. J., Boogaard, H., Nijland, H., & Hoek, G. (2010). Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8), 1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901747
Doughty, K., & Murray, L. (2016). Discourses of mobility: Institutions, everyday lives and embodiment. Mobilities, 11(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
Egan, R ., & Caulfield, B. (2024). Driving as essential, cycling as conditional: how automobility is politically sustained in discourses of everyday mobility, Mobilities, 19(4), 789-805, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2024.2325370
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 12(1).
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002002
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
Fairclough, N. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177–197.
Fischer, F. (1993). Evaluating public policy: Toward a post-positivist approach. Sage Publications.
Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992
Foucault, M. 1969. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
Freudendal-Pedersen, M. (2009). Mobility in daily life. Ashgate.
Freudendal-Pedersen, M. (2015). Mobility and sustainable transitions. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.001
Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033002006
Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.015
Giallouros, G., et al. (2020). The long-term impact of restricting cycling and walking during high air pollution days on all-cause mortality. Environment International, 140, 105679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105679
Gössling, S., & Cohen, S. (2014). Why sustainable transport policies fail. Journal of Transport Geography, 39, 197–206.
Haas, Tobias. (2020). “Cracks in the Gearbox of Car Hegemony: Struggles over the German Verkehrswende between Stability and Change.” Mobilities 15 (6): 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817686
Hajer. M. (1993). Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain. In: Fischer. F. & Forester, J. (eds). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press, London.
Hawkes, T. (2018). Metaphor. London & New York, Routledge.
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 59–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
Hickman, R. 2025. Discourses on Sustainable Urban Mobility. London: UCL Press.
Illich, I. (1974). Energy and equity. Harper & Row.
IMNA. (2021, September). Cycling in Tehran is a failed policy. Retrieved from https://www.imna.ir/x6t6J [In Persian]
ISNA. (November 2022). Bicycle lanes in Tehran have become a persistent problem. Retrieved from https://www.isna.ir/xdMJSh [In Persian].
Kębłowski, W., & Bassens, D. (2018). “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography, 39(3), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1336320
Kong, H., Wu, J., & Li, P. (2024). Impacts of active mobility on individual health mediated by physical activities. Social Science & Medicine (1982. Print), 116834–116834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116834
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lees, L. (2004). Urban geography: discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph473pr (Original work published 2004)
Lupton, D. (2013). Risk and everyday life. Health, Risk & Society, 15(1), 1–10.
Lyons, G., & Davidson, C. (2016). Guidance for transport planning. Transport Policy, 47, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.002
MacArthur, J., Dill, J., & Person, M. (2018). E-bike adoption. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.002
McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2011). Mobile urbanism. University of Minnesota Press.
Miner, P., Smith, B. M., Jani, A., McNeill, G., & Gathorne-Hardy, A. (2024). Car harm: A global review of automobility’s harm to people and the environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 115(0966-6923). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817
Mizdrak, A., Tatah, L., Mueller, N., Shaw, C., & Woodcock, J. (2023). Assessing the health impacts of changes in active transport: An updated systematic review. Journal of Transport & Health, 33, 101702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101702
Mögele, B., & Rau, H. (2020). Framing sustainable mobility transitions. Mobilities, 15(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1698203
Moradi, H. (2023). Analysis, evaluation, and assessment of the progress of the urban cycling development plan in Tehran metropolis (Management report). Tehran Urban Planning and Research Center. [In Persian]
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of Organization (Updated Edition of the International Bestseller). Sage, Thousand Oaks
Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda D., Cole-Hunter T., De Nazelle A., Dons E., Gerike R., Goetschi T., Panis LI., Kahlmeier S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Health impact assessment of cycling. Environment International, 85, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.08.007
Nikolaeva, A., Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Lee, J. Y., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2019). Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44 (2), 346–360 .
Norton, P. D. (2011). Fighting traffic: the dawn of the motor age in the American city. MIT Press. Cambridge
Packer, J. (2008). Automobility and the public sphere. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 5(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420802192423
Paterson, M. (2007). Automobile politics. Cambridge University Press.
Pedersen, O. C. (2025). Placing futures in regimes of im/mobilities. Mobilities, 20(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2024.2394525
Popan, C. 2020. “Beyond Utilitarian Mobilities: Cycling Senses and the Subversion of the Car System.” Applied Mobilities 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1775942
Portugali, J., & Alfasi, N. (2008). An Approach to Planning Discourse Analysis. Urban Studies, 45(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007085962 (Original work published 2008)
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2012). City cycling. Urban and industrial environments. MIT Press.
sCharteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sheller, M. (2004). Automotive emotions. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0263276404046068.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00276
Soza-Parra, J., & Cats, O. (2024). The role of personal motives in determining car ownership and use: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 44(3), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2278445
Stibbe, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics and the stories we live by. Language Sciences, 41, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.002
Tainio, M., de Nazelle, Audrey J, Götschi, T., Kahlmeier, S., Rojas-Rueda, David., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Hérick de Sá ,T., Kelly, P., Woodcock, J . (2016). Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Preventive Medicine, 87, 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002
Te Brömmelstroet, M., Nikolaeva, A., Glaser, M., Nicolaisen, M. S., & Chan, C. (2017). Travelling together alone and alone together: mobility and potential exposure to diversity. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1283122.
Tehran Air Quality Control Company. (2025). Air quality and noise report of Tehran, year 2024. Retrieved from http://air.tehran.ir [In Persian].
Toner, A., Lewis, J. S., & Stanhope, J. (2021). Prescribing active transport as a planetary health intervention. Physical Therapy Reviews, 26(1), 25–33. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1876598
Transportation. (n.d.). In Etymonline. Retrieved February 27, 2026, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/transportation
Transportation. (n.d.-b). In Etymonline. Retrieved February 27, 2026, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/transportation
Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). Principles of critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed., pp. 62–85). London: Sage.
Willson, R. (2001). Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation, 28(1), 1-31.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.
Zittoun, T., et al. (2020). Imagination in transitions. Culture & Psychology, 26(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19888169

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 March 2026
  • Revise Date: 26 April 2026
  • Accept Date: 10 May 2026
  • First Publish Date: 10 May 2026
  • Publish Date: 21 June 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics